Abstract

PurposeTo provide population-based reference values for cervical spinal canal parameters and vertebral body (VB) width and to study their associations with sex, age, body height, body weight and body mass index (BMI) using MRI.MethodsCross-sectional analyses included data from 2,453 participants, aged 21–89 years, of the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) who underwent whole-body MRI at 1.5 Tesla between July 2008 and March 2011. A standardised reading was performed for the C2-C7 cervical spine levels at sagittal T2 TSE weighted sequences.ResultsReference intervals for spinal canal parameters were similar in males and females, while VB width was on average 2.1–2.2 mm larger in males. Age effects were only substantial regarding VB width with a 0.5 mm per ten-year age increase. Body height effects were only substantial regarding the osseous spinal canal and VB width. Body weight and BMI effects are mostly not substantial.ConclusionsOur study provides MRI-based reference values for the cervical spinal canal parameters in an adult Caucasian population. Except for VB width, associations with sex, age and somatometric measures are mostly small and thus have only limited clinical implications. Some available cut-off values may need a revision because they likely overestimate risks.

Highlights

  • magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a crucial role in the assessment of cervical spine disorders [1,2,3]

  • Reference intervals for spinal canal parameters were similar in males and females, while vertebral body (VB) width was on average 2.1–2.2 mm larger in males

  • Our study provides MRI-based reference values for the cervical spinal canal parameters in an adult Caucasian population

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reference values for the spinal canal derived from MRI are still not available. This complicates a proper understanding of what a normal morphological finding distinguishes from an abnormal one. Previous studies related to the cervical spinal canal are limited with regards to inferences about the general population due to: a) failure to report reference ranges based on adequate percentiles, i.e. the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles [4,5,6,7,8,9]; b) small sample sizes [4, 6,7,8,9]; c) small age ranges [6,7,8]; and d) sampling in specific populations (e.g., only men or medical staff) [4, 6, 9]. The study samples were not drawn from a general population and the findings were inconclusive It remains unclear whether these parameters are associated with the spinal canal parameters

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call