Abstract
In a recent article in this journal it was argued that the costs of Industrial Revenue Bonds exceed their benefits and the program, therefore, should be abolished. This note reevaluates the benefits and costs as presented in that article. It is concluded that the costs enumerated in the previous study were overstated whereas the benefits were understated. Among the social costs discussed, only transaction costs and distributional consequences are found to be valid. Absent from the previous study's benefit considerations was the increased capital formation resulting from low-interest Industrial Revenue Bonds.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.