Abstract
BackgroundChloroquine had been used extensively during the last five decades in Cameroon. Its decreasing clinical effectiveness, supported by high proportions of clinical isolates carrying the mutant pfcrt haplotype (CVIET), led the health authorities to resort to amodiaquine monotherapy in 2002 and artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) in 2004 (artesunate–amodiaquine, with artemether–lumefantrine as an alternative since 2006) as the first-line treatment of uncomplicated malaria. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the withdrawal of chloroquine was associated with a reduction in pfcrt mutant parasite population and reemergence of chloroquine-sensitive parasites in southeastern Cameroon between 2003 and 2012.MethodsThe frequency of pfcrt haplotypes at positions 72–76 in Plasmodium falciparum isolates collected from individuals in 2003 and 2012 in southeastern Cameroon was determined by sequence specific oligonucleotide probes-enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (SSOP-ELISA).ResultsThe proportions of parasites carrying the mutant haplotype CVIET and the wild-type CVMNK were 53.0 and 28.0% in 2003, respectively. The proportion of the mutant haplotype in samples collected 9 years later decreased to 25.3% whereas the proportion of parasites carrying the wild-type CVMNK haplotype was 53.7%.ConclusionsEven though the proportion of chloroquine-sensitive parasites seems to be increasing in southeastern Cameroon, a reintroduction of chloroquine cannot be recommended at present in Cameroon. The current national anti-malarial drug policy should be implemented and reinforced to combat drug-resistant malaria.
Highlights
Chloroquine had been used extensively during the last five decades in Cameroon
A series of clinical studies using the standardized World Health Organization (WHO) protocol to assess anti-malarial drug efficacy had shown the general inefficacy of chloroquine throughout the country, leading to the gradual withdrawal of chloroquine and the use of amodiaquine as the first-line drug for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria during the transition period between 2002 and 2004
July–August 2003 in Bertoua, Cameroon. This was part of a randomized study that compared the efficacy of amodiaquine, sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine, and amodiaquine–sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine combination in children aged less than 5 years old with uncomplicated malaria [5, 6]
Summary
Chloroquine had been used extensively during the last five decades in Cameroon. Its decreasing clinical effectiveness, supported by high proportions of clinical isolates carrying the mutant pfcrt haplotype (CVIET), led the health authorities to resort to amodiaquine monotherapy in 2002 and artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) in 2004 (artesunate–amodiaquine, with artemether–lumefantrine as an alternative since 2006) as the first-line treatment of uncomplicated malaria. A series of clinical studies using the standardized World Health Organization (WHO) protocol to assess anti-malarial drug efficacy had shown the general inefficacy of chloroquine throughout the country, leading to the gradual withdrawal of chloroquine and the use of amodiaquine as the first-line drug for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria during the transition period between 2002 and 2004. This was followed by the adoption of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) in
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
