Abstract

Observations from the Reef Visual Census program in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS) between 1999 and 2018 were used as a US Marine Biodiversity Observation Network case study to assess whether differences in biodiversity metrics (abundance, biomass, richness, Simpson diversity, and functional diversity) occurred across regions with different habitat types (high-relief, linear, and patch reefs), protection levels (no-take and unprotected zones), and types of protected zones. Protected areas had higher reef-fish biomass compared to unprotected areas at the beginning of the observation period, but these metrics decreased over time. We did not detect an effect of size of no-take marine zones, but rather found that large (18.7 km2) and small (average of 0.85 km2) areas had similar reef-fish abundance, biomass, and diversity indices. High-relief reef habitats had the greatest reef-fish abundance (20%–30%) and species richness (~20%), and nearly twice the biomass of other habitat strata, but biomass decreased 20%–30% in linear and patch reefs after 2007. Although high-relief reefs are important for biodiversity conservation and restoration, policies should address the decline in fish abundance, biomass, and diversity observed throughout the FKNMS. Monitoring should be sustained to support policies and respond to changing conditions related to climate change and resource use.

Highlights

  • Biodiversity is essential to maintaining ecosystem functions and services (Magurran, 1988; Sala and Knowlton, 2006)

  • After about 2008–2009, these biodiversity metrics decreased on average for no-take zones, and the differences compared to unprotected zones became less pronounced and generally not significant (Table S11)

  • High-relief reefs in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary (FKNMS) have the highest fish biomass, abundance, and species richness compared to linear and patch reefs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biodiversity (the variety of life in a particular habitat or ecosystem) is essential to maintaining ecosystem functions and services (Magurran, 1988; Sala and Knowlton, 2006) These functions and services are increasingly overused and are affected by climate change in coastal and marine ecosystems, leading to changes in species composition, distribution, biomass, and abundance. These changes have drawn international attention to the evaluation of biodiversity to help manage marine living resources (Bohnsack and Ault, 1996; Bengtsson, 1998; Jackson et al, 2001; Cheung et al, 2009; Fautin et al, 2010; Barnosky et al, 2011; Lafferty and Eckerberg, 2013; Sala et al, 2021). No-take marine zone management tools are designed to promote conservation and recovery of biological communities (Allison et al, 1998; Zupan et al, 2018; Claudet et al, 2020), we lack a clear understanding of their efficacy in the FKNMS

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call