Abstract

The 1978 expansion of the Redwood National Park involved the federal government in the taking of a significant part of the remaining merchantable inventory of old-growth redwood timber. Although Congress initially paid stumpage owners about $380 million, the adequacy of this compensation has been the subject of litigation.' One disputed point is whether anticipation of the taking resulted in a price increase for old-growth redwood stumpage, or price enhancement. The protagonists disagree about whether enhancement occurred, and if so, how much and when. The key is how anticipation changed the timber supply plans of the directly affected firms. A precise quantitative prediction of their response requires firm-specific harvest scheduling models which are not available. We argue, instead, that their planned intertemporal allocation of old-growth timber changes according to the predictions of an economic model of exhaustible resources. In

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call