Abstract
In this paper we study the complexity of sets that reduce to sparse sets (and tally sets), and the complexity of the simplest sparse sets to which such sets reduce. We show even with respect to very flexible reductions that NP cannot have sparse hard sets unless P = NP; an immediate consequence of our results is: If any NP-complete set conjunctively reduces to a sparse set, then P = NP. We also show that any set A that reduces to some sparse set (via various types of reductions) in fact reduces by the same type of reduction to a sparse set that is simple relative to A. We give a complete characterization of the sets of low instance complexity in terms of reductions to tally sets; it follows that if P ≠ NP, then no set of low instance complexity can be complete for NP with respect to disjunctive reductions or conjunctive reductions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.