Abstract

The $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}f$-PIC method is widely used for electrostatic particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations. Its basic idea is the ansatz $f=f_{0}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}f$ ($\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}f$-ansatz) where the particle distribution function $f$ is split into a usually time-independent background $f_{0}$ and a time-dependent perturbation $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}f$. In principle, it can also be used for electromagnetic gyrokinetic PIC simulations, but the required number of markers can be so large that PIC simulations become impractical. The reason is a decreasing efficiency of the $\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}f$-ansatz for the so-called ‘Hamiltonian formulation’ using $p_{\Vert }$ as a dynamic variable. As a result, the density and current moment of the distribution function develop large statistical errors. To overcome this obstacle we propose to solve the potential equations in the symplectic formulation using $v_{\Vert }$ as a dynamic variable. The distribution function itself is still evolved in the Hamiltonian formulation which is better suited for the numerical integration of the parallel dynamics. The contributions from the full Jacobian of phase space, a finite velocity sphere of the simulation domain and a shifted Maxwellian as a background are considered. Special care has been taken at the discretisation level to make damped magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) mode simulations within a realistic gyrokinetic model feasible. This includes devices like e.g. large tokamaks with a small aspect ratio.

Highlights

  • The δf -PIC method (Dimits & Lee 1993; Parker & Lee 1993) is widely used for electrostatic gyrokinetic particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations to discretise the gyro-centre particle number distribution function fs of a species s

  • Before we describe the gyrokinetic model in the Hamiltonian formulation we want to introduce the coordinate transformation p (R, v, μ, t) = v + q δA (R, t) m and its inverse v (R, p, μ, t) = p − q δA (R, t), m which links the symplectic with the Hamiltonian formulation

  • The control variates method in gyrokinetic PIC simulation The δf -PIC method is a control variates method (see Aydemir (1994) and appendix A) with the restriction α = 1 in (A 1), when it comes to the evaluation of the moments of the distribution function

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The δf -PIC method (Dimits & Lee 1993; Parker & Lee 1993) is widely used for electrostatic gyrokinetic particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations to discretise the gyro-centre particle number distribution function fs of a species s It is based on the δf -ansatz fs = f0s + δfs,. The so-called ‘p -formulation’ (Hahm, Lee & Brizard 1988) ( called the Hamiltonian formulation) of the gyrokinetic Vlasov–Maxwell system does not have this problem It suffers from a large statistical variance in the evaluation of the moments of the distribution function. The basic idea of the proposed algorithm is straightforward, the required accuracy of the numerical implementation is very high This is a consequence of the fact that in the MHD limit (k⊥ρ → 0) the ratio between the adiabatic and non-adiabatic parts of the distribution function can be more than three orders of magnitude. (v) Consistent finite element approach for the discretisation of the parallel electric field perturbation in the parallel dynamics

The statistical error in Monte Carlo integration
The model equations in the symplectic formulation
Transformation between the symplectic and Hamiltonian formulation
The model equations in the Hamiltonian formulation
The long-wavelength approximation of the ion skin term
The linear case
Transformation of the moments of the distribution function
The nonlinear case
The linearised pull-back transformation of the weights
Marker representation of the symplectic moments
Statistical error of the moments of the distribution function
The cancellation problem
The accuracy of the equilibrium quantities
Further sources of error
Finite element discretisation of the potential equations
Discretisation of the charge and current assignments
Discretisation of the matrix operators
Alternative discretisation of the potential equations
Solving of Ampère’s law
Solving of quasi-neutrality equation
Fourier filter in PIC
10. Marker discretisation of reduced phase space
10.1. Marker distribution in the velocity sphere
10.2.1. Linear tokamak simulation
10.3. Marker initialisation
10.4. Boundary conditions for the weights of the markers
10.4.2. Initialisation of the weight of a replacement marker
11.1. Implementation of MHD limit
11.2. Special case of an unsheared slab
12. Numerical test cases
12.1. Shear Alfvén wave in an unsheared slab
12.2.1. Numerical results
12.5. Nonlinear tearing mode in a sheared slab
13. Conclusions
14. Outlook
Caveats of the control variates method
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call