Abstract
Jets in cross flow are one of the fundamental issues for mixing studies. As a first step in this paper, a generic geometry of a jet in cross flow was simulated to validate the CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) tool. Instead of resolving the whole injection system, the effective cross-sectional area of the injection hole was modeled as an inlet surface directly. This significantly improved the agreement between the CFD and experimental results. In a second step, the calculated mixing in an ALSTOM EV burner is shown for varying injection hole patterns and momentum flux ratios of the jet. Evaluation of the mixing quality was facilitated by defining unmixedness as a global non-dimensional parameter. A comparison of ten cases was made at the burner exit and on the flame front. Measures increasing jet penetration improved the mixing. In the water tunnel the fuel mass fraction within the burner and in the combustor was measured across five axial planes using LIF (Laser Induced Fluorescence). The promising hole patterns chosen from the CFD computations also showed a better mixing in the water tunnel than the other. Distribution of fuel mass fraction and unmixedness were compared between the CFD and LIF results. A good agreement was achieved. In a final step the best configuration in terms of mixing was checked with combustion. In an atmospheric test rig measured NOx emissions confirmed the CFD prediction as well. The most promising case has about 40% less NOx emission than the base case.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.