Abstract

Changes of electric traction network with regulated and not-regulated reactive power compensation units (CU) are required due to switching on the reactive power static generators at the AC electric traction network sectioning points the specifying calculations of the reactive power. The method of calculation of power losses in the traction network with regulated and not-regulated cross capacity compensation units at the sectioning point was developed. The main positive effect of CU at the sectioning point is increasing of the carrying capacity of the railroad sections. However, calculation of CU effectiveness for reduction of electric power losses, as well as calculation of continuously controlled CU requires appropriate calculations. It is demonstrated that CU effectiveness at the sectioning points of reactive power compensation is reduced in connection with distribution of the draft load; CU regulation effectiveness is also reduced as a response to increase of the carrying capacity of the railroad section, which allows assessing the proposed calculation formulae. Presented examples of calculation for the actual baseline data demonstrate that full losses in the traction network (assumed as 100%) can be reduced by using of CU of the sectioning point up to 21% maximum with continuously controlled units and up to 13.4% with uncontrolled CU. As automatics of the reactive power static generator is designed for increasing the carrying capacity of the railroad, its operation frequently complies with the reactive power overcompensation regime when losses in the traction network are increased.

Highlights

  • The main positive effect of compensation units (CU) at the sectioning point is increasing of the carrying capac­ ity of the railroad sections

  • Calculation of CU effectiveness for reduction of electric power losses, as well as calculation of continuously controlled CU requires appropriate calculations. It is demonstra­ ted that CU effectiveness at the sectioning points of reactive power compensation is reduced in connection with distribution of the draft load; CU regulation effectiveness is reduced as a response to increase of the carrying capacity of the railroad section, which allows assessing the proposed calculation for­mulae

  • Presented examples of calculation for the actual baseline data demonstrate that full losses in the traction network can be reduced by using of CU of the sectioning point up to 21% maximum with continuously controlled units and up to 13.4% with uncontrolled CU

Read more

Summary

Qк U

Где ΔРт*с — средние потери мощности в тяговой сети при отсутствии КУ, кВт [1, 4]. Эти потери определяют. Полученные выражения ΔPреакт = ΔPтс sin j и ΔPакт = ΔPтс сos j позволяют оценить эффективность снижения потерь мощности КУ при компенсав тяговой сети, кВ (принимаем 25 кВ); l, lк, loi — рас- ции реактивной мощности. Однако если расчет вести для КУ поста секционигде ΔРтс — суммарные (полные) потери мощности; рования, то следует учесть, что к посту секционироΔРакт — составляющая потерь мощности от протека- вания относится только половина потерь мощности ния активных мощностей; ΔРреакт — то же от протека- в тяговой сети межподстанционной зоны. Отсюда потери от передачи активной мощности тока нагрузки (для действующего значения), относящейся к посту секционирования с КУ, можно преобразовать следующим образом: ΔРреакт(рег) = ΔРтс sin j = (Iср kэф) R sin j,. Здесь (Iср kэф)2 — действующее значение тока реактивной мощности тяговой нагрузки, относящейся к посту секционирования, который полностью компенсируется регулируемой КУ

Потери от передачи реактивной мощности будут равны
Список литературы
Findings
Информация об авторах
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call