Abstract
Patients with urolithiasis were randomly assigned to treatment with either original (N = 138) or refurbished (N = 125) electrodes on the Dornier HM3 lithotripter. There were no significant differences in stone burden, position, or radiopacity; frequency of pretreatment stent insertion; or generator voltage and number of shock waves in the two groups. The immediate success rates for renal pelvis stones were 77% in both groups; the rates of caliceal stones were 88% (original electrodes) and 83% (refurbished electrodes) and the rates for ureteral stones 72% (original electrodes) and 80% (refurbished electrodes). These differences were not statistically significant. It should be possible to reduce the cost of extracorporeal lithotripsy without compromise of treatment quality by using refurbished electrodes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have