Abstract

Nitrogen losses during composting processes lead to emissions problems and reduce the compost fertilizer value. Gas-permeable membranes (GPM) are a promising approach to address the challenge of reducing nitrogen losses in composting processes. This study investigated the applicability of two GPM membrane systems to recover N released during the closed composting process of laying hen manure. The ammonia (NH3) capture process was performed using two different systems over a period of 44 days: the first system (S1) consisted of 120 m of an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) membrane installed inside a 3.7 m3 portable, closed aerobic composter with forced ventilation; the second system (S2) consisted of 474 m of an ePTFE membrane placed inside as an external module designed for NH3 capture, connected to a closed aerobic composter through a pipe. In both cases, a 1 N H2SO4 acidic NH3 capture solution was circulated inside the membranes at a flow rate of 2.1 L·h−1. The amount of total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) recovered was similar in the two systems (0.61 kg in S1 and 0.65 kg in S2) due to the chosen membrane surface areas, but the TAN recovery rate was six times higher in system S1 (6.9 g TAN·m−2·day−1) than in system S2 (1.9 g TAN·m−2·day−1) due to the presence of a higher NH3 concentration in the air in contact with the membrane. Given that the NH3 concentration in the atmosphere of the membrane compartment directly influences the NH3 capture, better performance of the GPM recovery system may be attained by installing it directly inside the closed aerobic composters. Regardless of the chosen configuration, this technology allows N recovery as a stable and concentrated 1.4% N ammonium salt solution, which can be used for fertigation. The presented GPM systems may be used in community composting systems with low volumes of waste to be treated or in livestock facilities that have implemented best available techniques such as solid–liquid separation or anaerobic digestion, provided that the use of GPM technology in combination with these techniques also contributes to odor mitigation and improves biogas yields.

Highlights

  • A P0 T dt where F is the measured gas emission flux (g·m−2 ·day−1 ); V is the volume of the portable closed aerobic composter (m3 ); A is the area of the portable closed aerobic composter (m2 ); dCt /dt is the rate of change of gas concentration in the chamber; ρ is the gas density at standard conditions (g·m−3 ); T0 is the thermodynamic temperature in standard conditions (273 K); T is the thermodynamic temperature when sampled; P0 is the absolute atmospheric pressure in standard conditions (101 kPa); and P is the pressure at the sampling site

  • System system 2 (S2) would be most useful in livestock facilities that have already applied some form of best available technology (BAT) for manure management to contribute to pollution prevention and control, such as solid–liquid separation or anaerobic digestion, in which case it would be interesting to couple gas-permeable membrane technology to these techniques to recover N and contribute to odor mitigation

  • Gas-permeable membrane (GPM) technology has proved suitable for capturing NH3 volatilized in aerobic composting processes, allowing the recovery of nitrogen lost in the form of NH3 as a nonvolatile and concentrated ammonium salt that can be used as a fertilizer

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There are other technologies that involve the capture of NH3 by neutralization, adsorption, or precipitation, such as reverse osmosis [45], stripping towers [46], adsorption by zeolites [47], phosphate and magnesium precipitation [48], bioadsorbents [49], or gaspermeable membranes (GPM) [50] for recovery and reuse These technologies do not improve the quality of the compost products but reduce NH3 emissions to the atmosphere and recover N, which is important for the agricultural sector due to the high cost of commercial ammonia fertilizers [51]. 2). 1) or in a separate compartment inside thetoclosed aerobic composting reactor (system connected to the closed aerobic composter (system 2)

Materials and Methods
In this closed composter
Experimental Conditions
Physicochemical Analyses
Calculations
P T0 dCt
Discussion
Progression of the of theofmixture during the composting process in S1 and
Vibrational
Ammonia Emissions
Progression of ammonia emissions in system
Operational
Comparison with Other GPM-Based Systems Used in Manure Management
Economic Assessment
Applicability of the Evaluated Membrane Composting Systems
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call