Abstract
The formation of hydrothermal uranium ore deposits involves the reduction of dissolved U(VI)(aq) to uraninite. However, the nature of the reducing agent and the kinetics of such a process are currently unknown. These questions are addressed through dedicated experiments performed under conditions relevant for the genesis of unconformity-related uranium (URU) deposits. We tested the efficiency of the following potential reductants supposed to be involved in the reaction: H2, CH4, C-graphite and dissolved Fe(II). Results demonstrate the great efficiency of H2, CH4 and C-graphite to reduce U(VI)(aq) into uraninite in acidic chloride brines, unlike dissolved Fe(II). Times needed for H2 (1.4bar), CH4 (2.4bar) and C-graphite (water/carbon mass ratio=10) to reduce 1mM of U(VI)(aq) in an acidic brine (1m LiCl, pH≈1 fixed by HCl) to uraninite at 200°C are 12h, 3days and 4months, respectively. The effects of temperature (T) between 100°C and 200°C, H2 partial pressure (0.14, 1.4, and 5.4bar), salinity (0.1, 1 and 3.2mLiCl) and pH at 25°C (0.8 and 3.3) on the reduction rate were also investigated. Results show that increasing temperature and H2 partial pressure increase the reaction rate, whereas increasing salinity or pH have the reverse effect. The reduction of uranyl to uraninite follows an apparent zero-order with respect to time, whatever the considered electron donor. From the measured rate constants, the following values of activation energy (Ea), depending on the nature of the electron donor, have been derived: EaC-graphite=155±3kJmol−1, EaCH4=143±6kJmol−1, and EaH2=124±15kJmol−1 at T<150°C and 32±6kJmol−1 at T>150°C. An empirical relationship between the reaction rate, the hydrogen partial pressure, the uranyl speciation, and the temperature is also proposed. This allows an estimation of the time of formation of a giant U ore deposit such as McArthur River (Canada). The duration of the mineralizing event is controlled both by the U concentration in the ore-forming fluids and the dynamics of gaseous reductants input, and not by the kinetics of U(VI)(aq) reduction itself. Focused flow of mobile electron donors (H2, CH4) along quasi vertical fractured zones into U(VI)(aq)-bearing oxidized fluids may explain the large volume and high concentrations of uranium in the URU deposits.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.