Abstract
Abstract Is it possible to maintain a causal explanatory view of intentional explanation, hold some strong(ish) version of antireductionism with regard to intentional states and intentional laws, and be respectably materialist enough not to be accused of closet Cartesianism? The causal explanatory view I shall be considering is one in which the causal relation between our intentional states and intentional acts is supported by lawlike generalizations employing intentional vocabulary. The causal relations are predicated on the backs of the rationalizing links between intentional states. The intentional causal generalizations characterize empirical regularities between states as a consequence of these states having contents which bear rationalizing links to each other.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
