Abstract

Machiavellianism (Mach) and subclinical psychopathy are two widely studied antagonistic personality traits with distinct theoretical conceptualizations. Mach is conceptualized by strategic deviousness, cynicism, and pragmatic morality, whereas subclinical psychopathy is conceptualized by impulsive antisocial tendencies, callousness, and rule-breaking. However, existing measures of the two traits are typically highly correlated and have very similar nomological networks. Notably, even though psychopathy scales should be more strongly positively associated with antisocial impulsivity and more strongly negatively associated with conscientiousness than Mach scales, existing Mach and psychopathy scales tend to be similarly related to these constructs. We created a new Mach scale, the M7, and a new psychopathy scale, the P7, by selecting items from existing Mach and psychopathy scales on the basis of the correlations of these items with antisocial impulsivity and conscientiousness. Across three studies (combined N = 4,607), the M7 and P7 showed acceptable to good psychometric properties in terms of closeness to unidimensionality, measurement precision, temporal stability, measurement invariance across language and gender groups, and convergent and discriminant validity (nomological network, self-other agreement, and interpersonal perceptions in group interactions). Most importantly, the new scales assess clearly distinct latent traits that are more in line with their theoretical conceptualizations than established scales are.

Highlights

  • Machiavellianism (Mach), subclinical psychopathy, and subclinical narcissism are three interpersonally noxious and socially aversive personality traits that are frequently grouped together as the Dark Triad (Jones & Paulhus, 2014; Miller, Vize, Crowe, & Lynam, 2019; Paulhus & Williams, 2002)

  • The theoretical conceptualizations of the three traits are distinct, recent empirical work has indicated that Mach and subclinical psychopathy scales exhibit a lack of discriminant validity

  • Problems exist for both the Mach and psychopathy scales that are used in Dark Triad research in terms of the inclusion of content that is not central to the construct of interest

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Machiavellianism (Mach), subclinical psychopathy, and subclinical narcissism are three interpersonally noxious and socially aversive personality traits that are frequently grouped together as the Dark Triad (Jones & Paulhus, 2014; Miller, Vize, Crowe, & Lynam, 2019; Paulhus & Williams, 2002). A crucial difference in current theoretical conceptualizations of the two traits is that Mach is characterized by strategic rather than impulsive behavior, whereas subclinical psychopathy is characterized by thrill-seeking and reckless behavior rather than planful behavior (e.g., Jones & Paulhus, 2011, 2014; Miller et al, 2017). Cleckley’s (1964) conceptualization of psychopathy includes a large and diverse set of traits such as impulsive antisocial acts, pathological egocentricity, deceitfulness, and social adeptness For another example, the Triarchic Model of Psychopathy (Patrick et al, 2009) includes a variety of personality facets from three distinct phenotypic components: Disinhibition (i.e., impulsivity and negative affectivity), Boldness (i.e., social dominance, low stress reactivity, and thrill-adventure seeking), Meanness (e.g., callousness, cold-heartedness, and antagonism). Problems exist for both the Mach and psychopathy scales that are used in Dark Triad research in terms of the inclusion of content that is not central to the construct of interest

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call