Abstract
The Draize eye irritancy test in rabbits has been the focus of recent efforts to reduce the use of live animals in toxicity testing. A suitable alternative is not yet available; therefore, we studied the adequacy of reducing the number of rabbits used per test. Data generated from 6-rabbit eye irritation tests of 155 various materials were used to determine the ability of irritation scores from all possible combinations of 5-, 4-, 3-, or 2-rabbit subsets to predict the Draize score derived from six rabbits. There are 930, 2325, 3100, and 2325 possible combinations of 155 studies for the 5-, 4-, 3-, and 2-rabbit subsets, respectively. We classify materials using a four-level adjectival rating system based on (among other factors) the Draize score. Comparisons indicated that 5-, 4-, 3-, and 2-rabbit scores were in 98, 96, 94, and 91% agreement, respectively, with the classification assigned on the basis of the 6-rabbit score. The correlation coefficients for randomly selected subsets of 5-, 4-, 3-, and 2-rabbit scores versus the Draize score for six rabbits were 0.998, 0.996, 0.992, and 0.984, respectively. This study confirms the findings of an earlier report by De Sousa et al. (1984) , and indicates that a high level of accuracy can be obtained with reduced numbers of rabbits per test.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
