Abstract

When making two bars haptically parallel to each other, large deviations have been observed, most likely caused by the bias of a hand-centered egocentric reference frame. A consistent finding is that women show significantly larger deviations than men when performing this task. It has been suggested that this difference might be due to the fact that women are more egocentrically oriented than men or are less efficient in overcoming the egocentric bias of the hand. If this is indeed the case, reducing the bias of the egocentric reference frame should eliminate the above-mentioned gender difference. This was investigated in the current study. Sixty participants (30 men, 30 women) were instructed to haptically match (task HP) the orientation of a test bar with the dominant hand to the orientation of a reference bar that was perceived with the non-dominant hand. In a haptic visual task (task HV), in which only the reference bar and exploring hand were out of view, no motor response was required, but participants had to “match” the perceived orientation by verbally naming the parallel orientation that was read out on a test protractor. Both females and males performed better in the HV task than in the HP task. Significant gender effects were only found in the haptic parallelity task (HP), corroborating the idea that women perform at the same level as men when the egocentric bias of the hand is reduced.

Highlights

  • A seemingly simple task as making two bars haptically parallel to each other has been found to result in large deviations

  • Kappers (2002, 2003) proposed that the deviations observed in haptic parallelity are most likely caused by the use of a frame of reference that is intermediate to a frame based on egocentric and allocentric information

  • An egocentric reference frame refers to a frame that is centered on the body, while an allocentric reference frame is linked to external space (Klatzky 1998)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A seemingly simple task as making two bars haptically parallel to each other has been found to result in (often) large deviations In such a task, blindfolded participants have to match the orientation of a reference bar that is felt with one hand, on a test bar that is rotated with the other hand. Based on the results in reaching and grasping tasks, Flanders and Soechting (1995) suggested that hand orientation is controlled in an “intermediate” frame of reference. Following this suggestion, Kappers (2002, 2003) proposed that the deviations observed in haptic parallelity are most likely caused by the use of a frame of reference that is intermediate to a frame based on egocentric and allocentric information. The observed deviations are usually intermediate between allocentrically and egocentrically parallel and as such support a reference based model for haptic parallel matching (Van Mier 2014)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call