Abstract
We extensively analyze the impact of conductance "drift" - inherent to Phase Change Memory (PCM) devices - on the inference of pre-trained Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). Starting from large-array experimental characterization of PCM drift in partial-SET states, we build a statistical model of conductance drift capturing the cycle-to-cycle variability in drift-coefficient ν observed empirically. Using a variety of small and large DNNs (few-layer perceptrons using MNIST dataset, ResNet-(10,18,34) using CIFAR-10, and a 2-layer LSTM using "Alice in Wonderland"), we characterize how the combination of drift and ν-variability can induce long-term degradations in DNN accuracy. We then introduce several techniques to suppress these effects, including "slope correction" and modifications to the DNN architecture (choice of squashing function, the number of hidden units, hidden layers, or convolution filters). Finally, we show how noise sources such as 1/f and Random Telegraph Noise (RTN), and device-to-device variability in heater diameter, can complicate the accurate measurement of PCM drift.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.