Abstract

The aim of this study was to test Ovsynch (OVS) versus modified OVS (decreasing the interval between first GnRH and PGF2α to 6d) protocols on pregnancy per artificial insemination (AI) and OVS outcomes in cyclic dairy cows. Cyclic cows (n=920) were assigned to 1 of 2 groups: the OVS7 group (n=459) received the OVS protocol [GnRH treatment, PGF2α treatment 7d later, a second GnRH (GnRH2) treatment 56h later, and timed AI (TAI) 16 to 18h after the GnRH2 treatment], and the OVS6 group (n=461) received a modified OVS protocol, in which the interval between the first GnRH and PGF2α was decreased to 6d (GnRH treatment, PGF2α treatment 6d later, GnRH2 treatment 56h later, and TAI 16 to 18h after the GnRH2 treatment). The response to the first GnRH of OVS was similar between OVS7 (54.5%, 250/459) and OVS6 (54.2%, 250/461) groups. The ovulatory response to GnRH2 of OVS was higher in OVS6 (91.3%, 421/461) than OVS7 (84.5%, 388/459). The follicle size (mean ± standard error of the mean) at the time of TAI was smaller in OVS6 (15.23±0.11mm) than OVS7 (16.04±0.11mm). When all cows were evaluated, the pregnancy per AI at 31d tended to be lower in OVS6 (38.0%, 175/461) than in OVS7 (43.8%, 201/459). Moreover, the pregnancy per AI at 31d was lower in OVS6 (40.9%, 172/421) compared with OVS7 (50.3%, 195/388) in synchronized cows. In conclusion, although the modified OVS protocol decreased the follicle size at the time of AI and increased the ovulatory response to GnRH2 of OVS, it unexpectedly reduced fertility in cyclic lactating dairy cows.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call