Abstract

Introduction: The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has been established as a cost-effective test in colon cancer screening programmes. This test could also be helpful in symptomatic patients prior to colonoscopy, but data about diagnostic performance, and accurate cut-off values for these patients are still scarce.Materials and Methods: Prospective study that included consecutive unselected patients with gastrointestinal symptoms referred for colonoscopy between November 2016 and June 2018. We performed a FIT (FOB Gold® test, cut-off 20 micrograms of Hb/gram of feces) prior to colonoscopy and determined the accuracy of FIT in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value for clinically significant pathology, advanced neoplasia, and colorectal cancer in symptomatic patients, using two different cut-off values.Results: A total of 727 patients (44.3% men, aged 58.5 ± 14.9 years) was included in the study. The main symptom was history of previous (non-active) rectal bleeding (34.7%), followed by diarrhea (15.0%). Over one quarter of the patients (25.9%) had a positive FIT result. The caecal intubation rate was 95.5%. Clinically significant pathology was identified in 142 colonoscopies (19.5%), advanced neoplasia in 115 (15.8%) and colorectal cancer in 36 colonoscopies (5.0%). FIT performed very well for clinically significant pathology, advanced neoplasia and cancer, with a high negative predictive value (NPV). Reducing the cut-off value to 10 μg/g yielded similar NPV results, with a decrease in specificity. Using a combination of symptoms with a positive FIT result did not improve FIT performance. Only specificity was slightly higher compared to FIT alone, but this was paralleled by a decrease in sensitivity and NPV for cancer and clinically significant pathology. The odds of presenting clinically significant pathology, advanced neoplasia, or cancer increased with FIT concentration.Conclusions: The specificity and NPV of FIT for clinically significant pathology, advanced neoplasia, and cancer are high in symptomatic patients. FIT is a helpful test for determining the need to perform further studies. It may not be necessary to reduce the cut-off value for symptomatic patients, since FIT performance with the current standard cut-off value used in colorectal cancer screening was accurate. FIT can be used to avoid or prioritize colonoscopy procedures.

Highlights

  • The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has been established as a cost-effective test in colon cancer screening programmes

  • Some studies suggest that fecal hemoglobin concentration could be a predictor of risk for advanced neoplasia and Colorectal cancer (CRC) and could be used to prioritize the use of colonoscopy in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients who have a higher risk of presenting CRC or advanced neoplasia [13,14,15,16,17]

  • The main indication for colonoscopy was a prior history of rectal bleeding (34.7%), followed by diarrhea (15.0%) (Table 1); 14.6% [106] of patients were taking antiplatelet agents and 3.2% [23] anticoagulants

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has been established as a cost-effective test in colon cancer screening programmes This test could be helpful in symptomatic patients prior to colonoscopy, but data about diagnostic performance, and accurate cut-off values for these patients are still scarce. Multiple population-based screening programmes have been implemented in the past few years, based mostly on the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) [2, 3], which appears to be cost-effective compared to non-screening [4, 5] Gastrointestinal symptoms such as rectal bleeding, change in bowel habits, diarrhea, or abdominal pain are common to different gastrointestinal diseases and are considered poor predictors of the risk of CRC [6]. Some studies suggest that fecal hemoglobin concentration could be a predictor of risk for advanced neoplasia and CRC and could be used to prioritize the use of colonoscopy in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients who have a higher risk of presenting CRC or advanced neoplasia [13,14,15,16,17]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call