Abstract

CT guidance may improve precision for diagnostic and therapeutic spinal injections, but it can increase patient radiation dose. This study examined the impact of reducing tube current on patient radiation exposure and the technical success for these procedures, by using axial acquisitions for short scan lengths and eliminating nonessential imaging. Our institutional review board approved retrospective analysis of records from 100 consecutive outpatients undergoing spinal injections for pain before and after the CT protocol modification to reduce radiation dose. Data collected included patient age and sex, response to injection, number of sites and spinal levels treated, injection type, performing physician, CT acquisition method, number of imaging series, tube current, scan length, and DLP. Image contrast was reduced with the low-dose protocol, but this did not affect technical success or immediate pain relief. Mean DLP for all procedures decreased from 1458 ± 1022 to 199 ± 101 mGy · cm (P < .001). The range of radiologist-dependent DLP per procedure also was reduced significantly with the modified protocol. Selective nerve root blocks, lumbar injections, multiple injection sites, and the lack of prior imaging were each associated with a slightly higher DLP (<50 mGy · cm). Radiation to patients undergoing CT-guided spinal injections can be decreased significantly without affecting outcome by reducing tube current, using axial acquisitions for short scan lengths, and eliminating nonessential imaging guidance. These measures also decrease variability in radiation doses between different practitioners and should be useful for other CT-guided procedures in radiology.

Highlights

  • AND PURPOSE: CT guidance may improve precision for diagnostic and therapeutic spinal injections, but it can increase patient radiation dose

  • Image contrast was reduced with the low-dose protocol, but this did not affect technical success or immediate pain relief

  • Recent editorials have advocated for the development and widespread adoption of more uniform CT acquisitions to reduce both radiation dose and variability.[3,6]

Read more

Summary

Methods

Our institutional review board approved retrospective analysis of records from 100 consecutive outpatients undergoing spinal injections for pain before and after the CT protocol modification to reduce radiation dose. Data collected included patient age and sex, response to injection, number of sites and spinal levels treated, injection type, performing physician, CT acquisition method, number of imaging series, tube current, scan length, and DLP. In March 2010, our neuroradiology section made several modifications to CT protocols for spine interventions to reduce the radiation doses to our patients. To assess the impact of these measures on radiation reduction, we retrospectively collected data for the first 50 consecutive patients that followed the implementation of these changes. We collected data retrospectively for 50 consecutive patients undergoing procedures in March 2009, 1 year preceding the implementation of the dose-reduction steps. Patients were excluded if the dose report was not available

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call