Abstract

Clinical decision rules have reduced use of computed tomography (CT) to evaluate minor pediatric head injury in pediatric emergency departments (EDs). CT use remains high in community EDs, where the majority of children seek medical care. We sought to reduce the rate of CT scans used to evaluate pediatric head injury from 29% to 20% in a community ED. We evaluated a quality improvement (QI) project in a community ED aimed at decreasing the use of head CT scans in children by implementing a validated head trauma prediction rule for traumatic brain injury. A multidisciplinary team identified key drivers of CT use and implemented decision aids to improve the use of prediction rules. The team identified and mitigated barriers. An affiliated children's hospital offered Maintenance of Certification credit and QI coaching to participants. We used statistical process control charts to evaluate the effect of the intervention on monthly CT scan rates and performed a Wald test of equivalence to compare preintervention and postintervention CT scan proportions. The baseline period (February 2013-July 2014) included 695 patients with a CT scan rate of 29.2% (95% confidence interval, 25.8%-32.6%). The postintervention period (August 2014-October 2015) included 651 patients with a CT scan rate of 17.4% (95% confidence interval, 14.5%-20.2%, P < .01). Barriers included targeting providers with variable pediatric experience and parental imaging expectations. We demonstrate that a Maintenance of Certification QI project sponsored by a children's hospital can facilitate evidence-based pediatric care and decrease the rate of unnecessary CT use in a community setting.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.