Abstract

Oil palm plantations are intensively managed agricultural systems that increasingly dominate certain tropical regions. Oil palm monocultures have been criticized because of their reduced biodiversity compared to the forests they historically replaced, and because of their negative impact on soils, water, and climate. We experimentally test whether less intensive management schemes may enhance biodiversity and lessen detrimental effects on the environment while maintaining high yields. We compare reduced versus conventional fertilization, as well as mechanical versus chemical weed control (with herbicides) in a long-term, full-factorial, multidisciplinary experiment. We conducted the experiment in an oil palm company estate in Sumatra, Indonesia, and report the results of the first two years. We measured soil nutrients and functions, surveyed above- and below-ground organisms, tracked oil palm condition and productivity, and calculated plantation gross margins. Plants, aboveground arthropods and belowground animals were positively affected by mechanical versus chemical weed control, but we could not detect effects on birds and bats. There were no detectable negative effects of reduced fertilization or mechanical weeding on oil palm yields, fine roots, or leaf area index; however, stem growth was enhanced under mechanical weeding. Also, we could not detect detrimental effects of the reduced fertilization and mechanical weeding on soil nutrients and functions (mineral nitrogen, bulk density, and litter decomposition), but water infiltration and base saturation tended to be higher under mechanical weeding, while soil moisture and microbial biomass varied with treatment. Economic performance, measured as gross margins, was higher under reduced fertilization. There might be a delayed response of oil palm to the different management schemes applied, so results of future years may confirm whether this is a sustainable management strategy. Nevertheless, the initial effects of the experiment are encouraging to consider less intensive management practices as economically and ecologically viable options for oil palm plantations.

Highlights

  • Oil palm plantations are widespread in all tropical regions

  • Oil palm leaf litter decomposition inside palm circles increased by 20% under reduced fertilization with mechanical weeding compared to its lowest level under conventional fertilization with herbicide spraying

  • We refrain from interpreting these changes that we observed in incubated litterbags, as palm circles are normally devoid of oil palm leaf litter

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Oil palm plantations are widespread in all tropical regions. Oil palm is the most productive oil crop, and it is used in a variety of food and consumer products (Byerlee et al, 2016). The loss of biodiversity and ecosystem functions that occurs when oil palm plantations replace land that was historically covered by forest is considerable (Foster et al, 2011; Clough et al, 2016). These concerns have not halted the rampant growth and intensification of oil palm plantations because of their distinctive attractiveness for short-term economic profits compared to other agricultural land use options (Clough et al, 2016). Given that most of the area is managed by relatively few stakeholders (companies, compared to smallholders), there is potential to effectively improve environmental and ecological issues at large spatial scales while preserving economic interests

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call