Abstract

Introduction The aim of the study was to determine the usefulness of tranexamic acid (TXA) in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) and revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). We analyzed the perioperative blood loss with and without TXA in aseptic rTHA and rTKA as well as in second-stage reimplantation for hip and knee periprosthetic infection. Materials and MethodsIn this prospective cohort study, 147 patients receiving TXA (96 rTHA, 51 rTKA) were compared to a retrospective cohort of 155 patients without TXA (103 rTHA, 52 rTKA). The TXA regimen consisted of a preoperative bolus of 10 mg/kg bodyweight (BW) TXA plus 1 mg/kgBW/h perioperatively. Given blood products were documented and the perioperative blood loss was calculated. Thromboembolic events were registered until three months postoperatively. In subgroups, the effects of TXA were separately analyzed in 215 aseptic revisions as well as in 87 reimplantations in two-stage revisions for periprosthetic infection. ResultsBoth TXA groups showed a significantly reduced mean blood loss compared to the respective control groups. The TXA group of rTHA patients had a mean blood loss of 2916 ml ± 1226 ml versus 3611 ml ± 1474 ml in the control group (p<.001). For the TXA group of rTKA patients, mean calculated blood loss was 2756 ml ± 975 ml compared to 3441 ml ± 1100 ml in the control group (p=.0012). A significantly reduced blood loss was also found in the TXA subgroups for aseptic and septic revision procedures. No thromboembolic events were recorded among the TXA groups. ConclusionsThere is a significant reduction of perioperative blood loss under TXA influence without an increased incidence of adverse events. The standard use of TXA can be recommended in aseptic hip and knee revision arthroplasties as well as in second-stage reimplantations for periprosthetic infection.

Highlights

  • The aim of the study was to determine the usefulness of tranexamic acid (TXA) in revision total hip arthroplasty and revision total knee arthroplasty

  • Between January 2014 and December 2016, a total of 517 revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) or revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) were performed at our institution. 215 patients had to be excluded because either patients did not receive TXA according to the protocol or patients received TXA for individual reasons prior to the start of the standard operating procedure (SOP)

  • The results of the present study suggest that the use of TXA reduces blood loss in rTHA and rTKA without increasing the risk for thromboembolic events

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The aim of the study was to determine the usefulness of tranexamic acid (TXA) in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) and revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). We analyzed the perioperative blood loss with and without TXA in aseptic rTHA and rTKA as well as in second-stage reimplantation for hip and knee periprosthetic infection. The standard use of TXA can be recommended in aseptic hip and knee revision arthroplasties as well as in second-stage reimplantations for periprosthetic infection. A significant impact on perioperative blood conservation in primary hip and knee arthroplasty without increasing the risk of thromboembolic events has BioMed Research International been reported [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. There is only minimal literature on the effect and complication rates of TXA in revision procedures, including septic revisions

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call