Abstract

It is well established that trait anxious individuals have an attentional bias for threatening information and stimuli, as demonstrated through both the dot probe and cueing paradigms. In recent efforts to reduce attentional biases and minimize anxiety symptomatology, variations of the dot probe task have been used to train attention away from threat. However, under this paradigm, it is uncertain what the underlying mechanism for attentional bias is. Is anxiety being perpetuated by a shift in attention to threat or does it result from one’s inhibited ability to disengage from threat once it is attended to? The purpose of the present study was to train attention away from threat using a cueing task, thus isolating attentional biases to difficulties in disengaging from threat. The goal of this task was to train attention by manipulating the contingency between the location of a target and a threatening or affectively neutral pictorial cue. Eighty-nine trait anxious college students participated in this study. It was hypothesized that participants in training groups would be able to disengage from threat faster and subsequently show a greater decrease in state anxiety when compared to controls. However, the data failed to support the primary hypotheses of this study. Interestingly, none of the groups showed an attentional threat bias at pretest, which makes it difficult to evaluate the efficacy of the training task. Future research should continue to focus on developing alternative training techniques that can target the mechanism(s) responsible for attentional biases in anxious individuals.

Highlights

  • A great deal of effort over the last 30 years has gone into the exploration of how attentional biases relate to or influence anxiety disorders

  • These studies, along with many others, have led to the development of cognitive models of anxiety, which presume the notion that biased information processing perpetuates anxiety symptoms in that anxious individuals are typically less inclined to focus on information that indicates neutrality or safety [4,5]

  • Experiments utilizing the dot probe task have shown that anxious individuals, but not nonanxious individuals, are faster at identifying probes that appear in the same locate previously occupied by a threatening stimuli compared to neutral stimuli [7,9]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A great deal of effort over the last 30 years has gone into the exploration of how attentional biases relate to or influence anxiety disorders. Numerous studies have demonstrated the presence of attentional biases in emotional disorders [1,2,3]. For the emotional Stroop task, anxious participants have been shown to be slower at naming the color of threat compared to neutral words; no difference is found for non-anxious participants [10,11,12]. While in the cueing task, anxious participants compared to non-anxious participants have been shown to be slower at identifying targets following invalid threat than invalid neutral cues (cue and target appear in different spatial locations) and no difference is found for valid cues (cue and target appear in the same spatial location) [8,13,14]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call