Abstract

Introduction Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an opportunistic infection that causes substantial morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. This pooled analysis of Wyeth clinical trials explored the incidence of CMV infection in solid organ transplant recipients treated with sirolimus versus comparator immunosuppressant drugs. Methods Wyeth-conducted, multicenter, randomized, comparative trials with at least one non-sirolimus-containing arm and at least 6 months' complete data were included. Cases of CMV were investigator-identified. The occurrence of CMV in sirolimus-treated patients was assessed versus all other comparator agents, versus antimetabolite agents, and versus calcineurin inhibitors. Results Nine trials in recipients of renal, liver, and cardiac transplants met the inclusion criteria; eight enrolled de novo allograft recipients, and one was a conversion trial. The primary pooled analysis revealed an odd ratio for CMV infection of 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42 to 1.0, P = .047) on sirolimus versus comparator immunosuppressant drugs. The subanalysis of sirolimus versus antimetabolites showed an odds ratio for CMV of 0.39 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.81, P = .012), and for sirolimus versus calcineurin inhibitors the odds ratio was 0.58 (95% CI 0.34 to 1.01, P = .054). Conclusion This pooled analysis demonstrated a reduced risk of CMV infection among sirolimus-treated patients as compared to those receiving alternative forms of immunosuppression in Wyeth-sponsored clinical trials in solid organ transplantation. This risk reduction persisted in subgroup analyses stratified by class of comparator treatment.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.