Abstract

Preliminary evidence has shown that reduced ability to maximally raise vocal pitch correlates with the occurrence of aspiration (i.e., airway invasion by food or liquid). However, it is unclear if this simple task can be used as a reliable predictor of aspiration in stroke patients. Our aim was to examine whether maximum vocal pitch elevation predicted airway invasion and dysphagia in stroke. Forty-five consecutive stroke patients (<1 month poststroke) at a rehabilitation setting participated in a videofluoroscopic swallow study and two maximum vocal pitch elevation tasks. Maximum pitch was evaluated acoustically [maximum fundamental frequency (max F0)] and perceptually. Swallowing safety was rated using the Penetration/Aspiration Scale and swallowing performance was assessed using components of the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImPTM©). Data were analyzed using simple regression and receiver operating characteristics curves to test the sensitivity and specificity of max F0 in predicting aspiration. Correlations between max F0 and MBSImP variables were also examined. Max F0 predicted silent aspiration of small liquid volumes with 80% sensitivity and 65% specificity (p = 0.023; area under the curve: 0.815; cutoff value of 359.03 Hz). Max F0 did not predict non-silent aspiration or penetration in this sample and did not significantly correlate with MBSImP variables. Furthermore, all participants who aspirated silently on small liquid volumes (11% of sample) had suffered cortical or subcortical lesions. In stroke patients (<1 month poststroke), reduced maximum pitch elevation predicts silent aspiration of small liquid volumes with high sensitivity and moderate specificity. Future large-scale studies focusing on further validating this finding and exploring the value of this simple and non-invasive tool as part of a dysphagia screening are warranted.

Highlights

  • Oropharyngeal dysphagia is seen in more than 50% of patients post stroke [1], with 10–15% of stroke survivors experiencing persistent dysphagia for more than 6 months [2]

  • Voice Tasks and Recordings In order to determine the best methodology for using pitch elevation for swallowing screening, we examined differences between two vowels (/a/ and /i/) in achieving maximum pitch elevation

  • Results revealed that reduced maximum pitch elevation measured acoustically significantly predicted silent aspiration for small liquid volumes (5–10 mL) with high sensitivity and moderate specificity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Oropharyngeal dysphagia is seen in more than 50% of patients post stroke [1], with 10–15% of stroke survivors experiencing persistent dysphagia for more than 6 months [2]. SLPs perform clinical swallowing evaluations (CSEs) [8, 9] to determine whether an instrumental swallowing assessment [videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS), or flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES)] is warranted. Despite their widespread clinical utility, the sensitivity and specificity of dysphagia screenings remains variable. Preliminary evidence has shown that reduced ability to maximally raise vocal pitch correlates with the occurrence of aspiration (i.e., airway invasion by food or liquid). It is unclear if this simple task can be used as a reliable predictor of aspiration in stroke patients. Our aim was to examine whether maximum vocal pitch elevation predicted airway invasion and dysphagia in stroke

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.