Abstract
To the Editor. —The article by Kamal et al 1 concerns an important issue in hospital care: prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. However, I think that the title of the article and the wording of the Results section suggest that the incidence of actual infection was reduced. In this study, the authors claim that bonding of antibiotic to the inner luminal and outer surface of the catheter reduced catheter infection ; I think this term is misleading. In the title, abstract, and the body of the article, they repeatedly refer to organisms isolated from catheters as representing infections. In fact, catheters do not become infected, they become contaminated or colonized. People become infected, but there is a conspicuous absence of data demonstrating that infection in the patients in whom these catheters were placed was reduced. Actually, the 13 cases of septicemia in the control group and the 10 in the antibiotic-bonded group
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.