Reduced Incidence of Perioperative Periprosthetic Fractures Using Hybrid Rasp-Impaction Broaching Over Impaction Broaching When Using the Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Abstract

BackgroundA not infrequent complication encountered with the direct anterior approach is perioperative fracture. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of perioperative fractures using a hybrid rasp-impaction broach vs an impaction broach for a similarly designed stem.MethodsRetrospective study of 798 primary total hip replacements by 1 surgeon performed using noncollared dual tapered femoral stems, including 457 implanted using hybrid rasp-impaction broaching and 341 implanted using impaction broaching. Intraoperative and 90-day postoperative fractures were identified in each group. Bivariate tests and multivariate regression analysis were used to compare the 2 groups.ResultsThere were 33 (4.1%) fractures in the sample, 13 (2.8%) with hybrid rasp-impaction broaching and 20 (5.8%) with impaction broaching (P = .034). Three (0.7%) intraoperative fractures occurred with hybrid rasp-impaction broaching and 12 (3.5%) with impaction broaching (P = .003). Five (1.1%) total calcar fractures occurred with hybrid rasp-impaction broaching and 11 (3.2%) with impaction broaching (P = .034). Intraoperative calcar fractures occurred with 1 (0.2%) hybrid rasp-impaction broaching and 6 (1.8%) impaction broaching (P = .021). In multivariate analyses, hybrid rasp-impaction broaching had a statistically lower odds ratio (OR) for total fracture (OR 0.45 [0.22 to 0.93]); total intraoperative fracture (OR 0.17 [0.05 to 0.60]); total calcar fracture (OR 0.33 [0.11 to 0.97]); intraoperative calcar fracture (OR 0.11 [0.01 to 0.98]); and rate of readmission (OR 0.27 [0.10 to 0.78]).ConclusionThe use of a hybrid rasp-impaction broach compared with impaction broach led to a reduced incidence of periprosthetic fractures when using a dual tapered stem through the direct anterior approach.