Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Pancreas With Tilted Excitation Plane: A Preliminary Study.

Abstract

Reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging (rDWI) with tilted two-dimensional radiofrequency (RF) excitation planes has not yet been applied to the imaging of the pancreas although the utility of this technique which allows the acquisition of high-quality images without aliasing artifacts in the phase-encoding direction has been evaluated for brain and spinal cord imaging. To evaluate the visual image quality of the pancreas by tilting the excitation plane (tilted rDWI) in comparison to conventional DWI (cDWI) and rDWI without using the tilted excitation plane. Retrospective. Thirty-two patients evaluated for suspected pancreatobiliary diseases. Echo-planar imaging DWI (cDWI, rDWI, and tilted rDWI) acquired at 3 T. Images from each DWI sequence were analyzed by five radiologists to compare image quality (conspicuity of pancreatic edges, interslice signal homogeneity, overall image quality, and conspicuity of focal pancreatic lesions) and artifacts (presence of blurring or ghosting artifacts, susceptibility artifacts, and aliasing artifact). Shapiro-Wilk test was performed to assess whether data were normally distributed. Friedman test followed by Bonferroni-adjusted Wilcoxon signed-rank test for post hoc analysis was performed to compare image quality and artifact scores. The mean scores for conspicuity of pancreatic edges (3.36 vs. 2.37), interslice signal homogeneity (3.14 vs. 2.81), presence of ghosting artifacts (3.32 vs. 2.66), susceptibility artifacts (3.06 vs. 2.30), and aliasing artifacts (3.90 vs. 2.34), and overall image quality (3.49 vs. 2.36) were significantly higher in the tilted rDWI than in the rDWI (P < 0.017 for all parameters). The conspicuity score for focal pancreatic lesions tended to be higher in tilted rDWI than in rDWI (2.44 vs. 2.00, P=0.07). Tilted rDWI had better image quality and reduced artifacts relative to cDWI and rDWI techniques in the pancreas. 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.