Abstract

BackgroundParkinson’s disease is characterized by dopamine-responsive symptoms as well as aggregation of α-synuclein protofibrils. New diagnostic methods assess α-synuclein aggregation characteristics from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and recent pathophysiologic mechanisms suggest that CSF circulation disruptions may precipitate α-synuclein retention. Here, diffusion-weighted MRI with low-to-intermediate diffusion-weightings was applied to test the hypothesis that CSF motion is reduced in Parkinson’s disease relative to healthy participants.MethodsMulti-shell diffusion weighted MRI (spatial resolution = 1.8 × 1.8 × 4.0 mm) with low-to-intermediate diffusion weightings (b-values = 0, 50, 100, 200, 300, 700, and 1000 s/mm2) was applied over the approximate kinetic range of suprasellar cistern fluid motion at 3 Tesla in Parkinson’s disease (n = 27; age = 66 ± 6.7 years) and non-Parkinson’s control (n = 32; age = 68 ± 8.9 years) participants. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were applied to test the primary hypothesis that the noise floor-corrected decay rate of CSF signal as a function of b-value, which reflects increasing fluid motion, is reduced within the suprasellar cistern of persons with versus without Parkinson’s disease and inversely relates to choroid plexus activity assessed from perfusion-weighted MRI (significance-criteria: p < 0.05).ResultsConsistent with the primary hypothesis, CSF decay rates were higher in healthy (D = 0.00673 ± 0.00213 mm2/s) relative to Parkinson’s disease (D = 0.00517 ± 0.00110 mm2/s) participants. This finding was preserved after controlling for age and sex and was observed in the posterior region of the suprasellar cistern (p < 0.001). An inverse correlation between choroid plexus perfusion and decay rate in the voxels within the suprasellar cistern (Spearman’s-r=-0.312; p = 0.019) was observed.ConclusionsMulti-shell diffusion MRI was applied to identify reduced CSF motion at the level of the suprasellar cistern in adults with versus without Parkinson’s disease; the strengths and limitations of this methodology are discussed in the context of the growing literature on CSF flow.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.