Abstract
ABSTRACTThis paper provides a comparative institutionalist critique of New Zealand’s monetary redress process for survivors of abuse in care. Using an Irish comparator, the paper advances an institutionalist critique that focusses on how programme operations affect survivors’ interests. The paper first describes the historic claims processes in New Zealand and Ireland and then assesses monetary redress practice against four characteristic survivor interests: cost, transparency, support and justice.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
