Abstract
When he claimed that a little bit of dioxin might be good for people-might even prevent cancer in some cases-risk assessor John Graham brought down a firestorm of indignation during Senate confirmation hearings in 2001. Graham survived the hearings to take his place within the U.S. White House Office of Management oand Budget, although his views on dioxin, which first emerged when he was on the U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board, were roundly dismissed by senators and the public (1).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
