Abstract

We demonstrate by mathematical analysis and systematic computer simulations that redistribution can lead to sustainable growth in a society. In accordance with economic models of risky human capital, we assume that dynamics of human capital is modeled as a multiplicative stochastic process which, in the long run, leads to the destruction of individual human capital. When agents are linked by fully-redistributive taxation the situation might turn to individual growth in the long run. We consider that a government collects a proportion of income and reduces it by a fraction as costs for administration (efficiency losses). The remaining public good is equally redistributed to all agents. Sustainable growth is induced by redistribution despite the losses from the random growth process and despite administrative costs. Growth results from a portfolio effect. The findings are verified for three different tax schemes: proportional tax, taking proportional more from the rich, and proportionally more from the poor. We discuss which of these tax schemes performs better with respect to maximize growth under a fixed rate of administrative costs, and with respect to maximize the governmental income. This leads us to some general conclusions about governmental decisions, the relation to public good games with free-riding, and the function of taxation in a risk taking society.

Highlights

  • This paper shows how redistribution of income spurs growth of human capital in a society just because of a portfolio effect

  • Redistribution enhances the dynamic potential for human capital production of an economy

  • The enhancement can be explained by the effectiveness of the portfolio effect

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper shows how redistribution of income spurs growth of human capital in a society just because of a portfolio effect. Redistribution re-balances gains and losses from individuals and works as a portfolio effect which spurs growth into the individually lossy stochastic processes. Economic literature does not explicitly point out the portfolio effect through redistribution in the relationship between inequality and growth of human capital. Mirrlees motivates the insurance aspect with fairness considerations. This literature is partly linked to the literature about social preferences [5,6]. The literature of socio-political unrest [7,8] points out that redistribution guarantees social stability and reduces the effort the society has to make when inequality is high

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.