Abstract
Redistribution across individuals in a one-year-period framework is an empirically intensely studied question. However, a substantial share of annual redistribution might turn out to serve individual insurance in a longer perspective, reducing the level of actual redistribution across individuals. This paper investigates to what extent long-run redistribution diverges from annual redistribution in welfare states of different types. Exploiting panel data from the Cross-National Equivalent File (CNEF) for Australia, Germany, South Korea, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States, we find that welfare states like Germany that are assumed to engage in a high level of redistribution actually achieve relatively less redistribution between individuals in the long run than the United Kingdom or the United States. Regression results show that a higher share of elderly in a country is associated with more annual redistribution, but with less long-run redistribution between individuals. The results suggest that, in welfare states with aging populations, we might expect growing annual redistribution that, to a substantial extent, is in fact income smoothing for the elderly. (Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality Working Paper Series)
Highlights
Welfare states around the world strongly redistribute income to reduce income differences between their citizens
If a welfare state smoothes incomes over time, the widely used measures for annual redistribution will overstate redistribution between individuals in the long-run and a substantial share of annual redistribution will turn out to serve individual income stabilization
This paper makes two contributions: First, using panel data from the CrossNational Equivalent File (CNEF) 1970-2013, we calculate to what extent standard measures for annual redistribution widely used in the scientific literature and in policy debates overstate the long-run redistributive impact in six welfare states
Summary
Welfare states around the world strongly redistribute income to reduce income differences between their citizens. Welfare states insure their citizens against risks such as sickness, disability, longevity and unemployment, stabilizing their income over time This only becomes evident when extending the measurement period to more than one year. If a welfare state smoothes incomes over time, the widely used measures for annual redistribution will overstate redistribution between individuals in the long-run and a substantial share of annual redistribution will turn out to serve individual income stabilization. This paper makes two contributions: First, using panel data from the CrossNational Equivalent File (CNEF) 1970-2013, we calculate to what extent standard measures for annual redistribution widely used in the scientific literature and in policy debates overstate the long-run redistributive impact in six welfare states. Regression results show that a higher share of elderly is associated with more annual, but less long-run redistribution between individuals.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.