Abstract

Previous literature demonstrates that beliefs about the determinants of income inequality play a major role in individual support for income redistribution. This study investigates how people form beliefs regarding the extent to which work versus luck determines income inequality. Specifically, I examine whether people form self-serving beliefs to justify supporting personally advantageous redistributive policies. I use a laboratory experiment where I directly measure beliefs and manipulate the incentives to engage in self-deception. I first replicate earlier results demonstrating that (1) people attribute income inequality to work when they receive a high income and to luck when they receive a low income and (2) their beliefs about the source of income inequality influence their preferences over redistributive policies. However, I do not find that people’s beliefs about the causes of income inequality are further influenced by self-serving motivations based on a desire to justify favorable redistributive policies. I conclude that, in my experiment, self-serving beliefs about the causes of income inequality are driven primarily by overconfidence and self-image concerns and not to justify favorable redistributive policies.

Highlights

  • Income inequality has increased almost everywhere over the past few decades (World Inequality Report, 2018)

  • Previous literature demonstrates that beliefs about the determinants of income inequality play a major role in individual support for income redistribution

  • The results indicate that people who are less inclined to support redistribution are more likely to believe that income is due mainly to work

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Income inequality has increased almost everywhere over the past few decades (World Inequality Report, 2018). Rising inequality is a concern, as it is negatively associated with long-term growth and creates social problems

Valero
Related literature
Observational data
Experiment
Experimental design
Procedure
A simple model
Timing and information structure
No information about the possibility to redistribute
Information about the possibility to redistribute
Results
High‐income versus low‐income participants in no information
High‐income beliefs in no information versus information
Redistribution in no information versus information
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.