Abstract

While the majority of symbiosis research is focused on bacteria, microbial eukaryotes play important roles in the microbiota and as pathogens, especially the incredibly diverse Fungi kingdom. The recent emergence of widespread pathogens in wildlife (bats, amphibians, snakes) and multidrug-resistant opportunists in human populations (Candida auris) has highlighted the importance of better understanding animal–fungus interactions. Regardless of their prominence there are few animal–fungus symbiosis models, but modern technological advances are allowing researchers to utilize novel organisms and systems. Here, I review a forgotten system of animal–fungus interactions: the beetle–fungus symbioses of Drugstore and Cigarette beetles with their symbiont Symbiotaphrina. As pioneering systems for the study of mutualistic symbioses, they were heavily researched between 1920 and 1970, but have received only sporadic attention in the past 40 years. Several features make them unique research organisms, including (1) the symbiont is both extracellular and intracellular during the life cycle of the host, and (2) both beetle and fungus can be cultured in isolation. Specifically, fungal symbionts intracellularly infect cells in the larval and adult beetle gut, while accessory glands in adult females harbor extracellular fungi. In this way, research on the microbiota, pathogenesis/infection, and mutualism can be performed. Furthermore, these beetles are economically important stored-product pests found worldwide. In addition to providing a historical perspective of the research undertaken and an overview of beetle biology and their symbiosis with Symbiotaphrina, I performed two analyses on publicly available genomic data. First, in a preliminary comparative genomic analysis of the fungal symbionts, I found striking differences in the pathways for the biosynthesis of two B vitamins important for the host beetle, thiamine and biotin. Second, I estimated the most recent common ancestor for Drugstore and Cigarette beetles at 8.8–13.5 Mya using sequence divergence (CO1 gene). Together, these analyses demonstrate that modern methods and data (genomics, transcriptomes, etc.) have great potential to transform these beetle–fungus systems into model systems again.

Highlights

  • While the majority of symbiosis research is focused on bacteria, microbial eukaryotes play important roles in the microbiota and as pathogens, especially the incredibly diverse Fungi kingdom

  • First publishing on these beetles in 1921, Paul Buchner described the mode of transmission between generations for the St. paniceum symbiosis including the extracellular population of Symbiotaphrina in the accessory gland, depositing symbiont cells to the chorion of the egg, and the larval behavior of consuming the symbionts after hatching [37]

  • A host-associated lifestyle can reduce the effective population size (Ne) of symbionts which increases genetic drift and relaxed selection on many symbiont traits can accelerate the effects of Muller’s ratchet [133]. This pattern has not been described in fungal symbiont genomes, Genome degradation that results in reduced genome size is commonly observed in bacterial symbionts as a result of genetic drift and Muller’s ratchet [107]

Read more

Summary

Modern Systems of Symbiosis Research

The current animal–microbe research landscape is dominated by the same model systems used in genetic and biomedical research (e.g., mice, zebrafish, Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans) [1]. The Drugstore beetle, Stegobium paniceum (Linnaeus), and the Cigarette beetle, Lasioderma serricorne (Fabricius), are both members of Anobiidae sensu stricto, within the family Ptinidae sensu lato Asterisks indicate the taxonomic lineages containing the hosts (Drugstore and tree—Bell & Philips (2012) [46], Gearner (2019) [48], McKenna et al (2019) [49]; fungal tree—Nagy et Cigarette beetles) and the symbiont (Symbiotaphrina). The anobiid-Symbiotaphrina symbiosis likely dates to before this common ancestor, since a non-symbiotic ancestor of L. serricorne and St. paniceum would require the independent acquisition of a Symbiotaphrina partner, which is an unlikely scenario More work on both the beetle and the Symbiotaphrina phylogenies is required to firmly date this symbiosis and identify the number of independent symbiosis events between Anobiidae s.s. beetles and Symbiotaphrina

The Fungi
Beetle–Fungus Life Cycle
Morphology of the Mycetome and Oviposition Organs
Gut Microbiota and Extracellular Symbionts
Maintenance of an Infection through Symbiosis
The Historical Research Perspective
Nutritional Supplementation
Biosynthesis
Detoxification
Artificial Host–Symbiont Pairs
Laboratory Rearing and Experimental Manipulation
Modern Methodological Advances
Beyond the Symbioses of Drugstore and Cigarette Beetles
Bostrichoid Beetle Taxonomy and Diversity
Bostrichoid Symbioses
Conclusions
Findings
Methods
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call