Redefining the “Honor Roll:” do hospital rankings predict surgical outcomes or receipt of quality surgical care?

Abstract

BackgroundHospital ranking systems are often used by individuals to inform choice around which healthcare system may be best equipped to manage their care. MethodsThe 2013–2015 100% Medicare Inpatient and Outpatient SAFs was utilized to identify patients who underwent surgery (AAA repair, CABG, THA, TKA and lung resection) at one of the top-20 hospitals ranked by USNWR. ResultsOn multivariable linear regression analysis, after controlling for clinical and hospital level factors, rank position among the top 20 USNWR hospitals was not associated with the proportion of patients who experienced a complication (β = 0.167), failure-to-rescue (β = 0.277), 90-day readmission (β = 0.186) and 90-day mortality (β = 0.033)(all p > 0.05). Similar trends were observed among each surgical procedure type, as well as even among all top 50 USNWR ranked hospitals (all p > 0.05). ConclusionRank position among hospitals within the USNWR "honor roll" was not associated with differences in patient outcomes following surgical intervention. Patients and hospitals need to exercise caution when placing weight on rank-position among hospitals as a means to discriminate clinical outcomes and quality of actual patient care.