Abstract

Asset pricing literature typically labels stocks with high price multiples as growth and stocks with low price multiples as value. This definition is accompanied by the view that, over the long term, value outperforms growth and encourages investors to make a binary choice between the two styles. In this second article on redefining growth, we demonstrate that portfolios constructed using an analyst forecast–based definition of growth consistently outperform and that this outperformance is not attributable to the established style factors. Consequently, we demonstrate that 1) the explanation of the cross section of stock returns is aided by the addition of a growth variable and 2) systematic multifactor strategies that combine value and growth factors outperform those that exclude growth.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.