Redefining aberrant P53 expression of gastric cancer and its distinct clinical significance among molecular-histologic subtypes

Abstract

BackgroundNumerous studies have demonstrated a correlation between p53 overexpression and diminished survival in gastric cancer patients. However, conflicting findings exist, and we hypothesize that these discrepancies arise from the cancer's complexity and heterogeneity, coupled with a lack of consensus on aberrant p53 expression. MethodsWe enrolled a cohort of 187 patients with surgically resected gastric cancer. Patient categorization was based on Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), microsatellite instability (MSI), and Lauren classification (intestinal, diffuse and mixed). Utilizing an incremental algorithm, we evaluated p53 immunohistochemical (IHC) patterns in all 187 cases, while next-generation sequencing was successfully performed on 152 cases to identify TP53 mutations (mutTP53). ResultsMutTP53 was identified in 32 % of the 152 cases, comprising 36 missense, 5 nonsense, and 7 frameshift alterations. Missense mutations predominantly correlated with p53 overexpression, while nonsense and frameshifting alterations related to null expression. Trial calculations indicated that null expression and a p53 IHC cutoff at >40 % offered the best prediction of mutTP53 (kappa coefficient, 0.427), with the highest agreement (0.524) observed in diffuse type and the lowest (0.269) in intestinal type. Null expression and a p53 IHC cutoff at >10 %, but not mutTP53 per se, provided the optimal prediction of survival outcome (p = 0.043), particularly in diffuse type (p = 0.044). Multivariate analysis showed that aberrant p53 IHC expression was not an independent prognostic factor. ConclusionsP53 IHC patterns are predictive biomarkers for mutTP53 and gastric cancer outcomes, where a prerequisite involves a nuanced approach considering cutoff values and molecular-histologic subtyping.