Abstract

Background and ObjectivesThere is limited evidence regarding the advantage of transfusing extended phenotype‐matched (EPM) packed red blood cells (PRBCs) to prevent alloimmunization in haemato‐oncology patients. This randomized control trial aimed to determine the alloimmunization in haemato‐oncology patients transfused with PRBCs which are EPM for Rh (C, E, c, e) and Kell (K) antigens (group I) versus those receiving standard compatible PRBCs (group II).Materials and MethodsPatients having a negative antibody screen (ABS), direct antiglobulin test (DAT) and autologous control (AC) were randomly allocated to either group I or II (n = 50 each). A follow‐up (FU) testing post‐transfusion was conducted for haemoglobin (Hb), ABS and DAT at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months. ABS was conducted using fully automated immunohaematology analyser, while DAT, compatibility testing and extended phenotyping were conducted manually using column agglutination technique.ResultsThere was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to mean (±SD) Hb at initial enrolment (group I, 5·06 ± 1·29 g/dl and group II, 5·41 ± 1·37 g/dl; P = 0·179), age (40 ± 17·3 years v/s 42·2 ± 17·2 years; P = 0·523), gender (P = 0·835) and diagnosis (P = 0·06). All patients in group I and II had negative ABS, DAT and AC at all three FUs. Group II patients were transfused more PRBCs (372 v/s 187, P = 0·000), while the mean Hb increment between successive FU was significant in both the groups (P = 0·003).ConclusionIt appears that there is no added benefit of providing EPM PRBCs in haemato‐oncology patients, as none developed RBC alloantibodies.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.