Abstract
IntroductionDespite the importance of quotes in reporting qualitative research, to our knowledge, there is no consensus regarding whether using the same quotes in multiple manuscripts is self-plagiarism or is an acceptable practice. It is important to explore this phenomenon to ensure the quality and integrity of published qualitative health research. ObjectiveTo explore current practices around self-plagiarism within health systems research. MethodsWe sought the opinions of experts in publishing qualitative health research (i.e.: journal editors and reviewers). Twenty-one journals were emailed to explore the re-use of quotations derived from qualitative data collection. Thematic analysis was conducted, exploring both common and opposing viewpoints. ResultsEleven journals provided information. Two journals responded with refusal to answer. Eight did not respond. Responses were categorized into three groups: YES – plagiarism (n = 0), NO – not plagiarism (n = 4), and no definite opinion (n = 7). DiscussionIn this paper, we summarize the perspectives of key informants on the use of the same quotes that are derived from qualitative data collection, in multiple manuscripts. It is the responsibility of all parties – journal editors, reviewers, and authors – to maintain the quality and integrity of qualitative research. Recommendations for best practices in reporting will lead to a higher quality of published research.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
