Abstract
Under well-watered conditions in the laboratory, Sedum pulchellum assimilated CO2 only during the day, yet exhibited small nocturnal increases in tissue acid content followed by deacidification in the light (CAM-cycling). When drought-stressed, little CO2 was fixed in the day and none at night, yet even greater acid fluctuations were observed (CAM-idling). Calculations indicate that water savings associated with CAM-cycling when water is available are small. Water saving is more likely to be significant during CAM-idling when water supply is limited and stomata are closed day and night. Thus, in this species, CAM-idling may be of greater benefit to the plant, relative to CAM-cycling, in surviving habitats prone to frequent drought stress.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
