Abstract
Fine-grained opinion analysis aims to extract aspect and opinion terms from each sentence for opinion summarization. Supervised learning methods have proven to be effective for this task. However, in many domains, the lack of labeled data hinders the learning of a precise extraction model. In this case, unsupervised domain adaptation methods are desired to transfer knowledge from the source domain to any unlabeled target domain. In this paper, we develop a novel recursive neural network that could reduce domain shift effectively in word level through syntactic relations. We treat these relations as invariant “pivot information” across domains to build structural correspondences and generate an auxiliary task to predict the relation between any two adjacent words in the dependency tree. In the end, we demonstrate state-of-the-art results on three benchmark datasets.
Highlights
The problem of fine-grained opinion analysis involves extraction of opinion targets and opinion expressions from each review sentence
Recursive Neural Structural Correspondence Network (RNSCN)-Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU): Our proposed joint model integrating auxiliary relation prediction task into RNN that is further combined with GRU
The results for aspect terms (AS) transfer are much lower than opinion terms (OP) transfer, which indicate that the aspect terms are usually quite different across domains, whereas the opinion terms could be more common and similar
Summary
The problem of fine-grained opinion analysis involves extraction of opinion targets (or aspect terms) and opinion expressions (or opinion terms) from each review sentence. Li et al (2012) proposed a bootstrap method based on the TrAdaBoost algorithm (Dai et al, 2007) to iteratively expand opinion and aspect lexicons in the target domain by exploiting source-domain labeled data and cross-domain common relations between aspect terms and opinion terms. Their model requires a seed opinion lexicon in the target domain and pre-mined syntactic patterns as a bridge. The requirement for rules makes the above methods non-flexible
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.