Rectifying a Chronicle of Contradictions: The Political Context of Abraham Wheelock’s 1643 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle

Abstract

Abraham Wheelock’s first edition of theAnglo-Saxon Chronicleappeared at the height of the First English Civil War in 1643, and it is often treated by modern critics as an appendix to the Old EnglishHistoria Ecclesiasticato which it is attached. This paper argues that theChronicleparticipated in a larger royalist campaign to establish the West Saxons as the institutional forbears of the first two Stuart kings. The West Saxon genealogies authorize a seventeenth-century conception of patriarchal, divine kingship when they trace Alfred to the biblical Adam. Alternatively, the medievalChroniclepresents the advisory body of the Anglo-Saxons, thewitan,as a potentially restrictive force upon the monarchy—an image incompatible with a royalist agenda. Wheelock mediates the contradictory presence of the powerfulwitanby diminishing its historical importance through excision, substitution, and inconsistent translation so that theChroniclemay more easily conform to early modern perceptions of absolutist kingship.