Rectal preparation significantly improves prostate imaging quality: Assessment of the PI-QUAL score with visual grading characteristics

Abstract

PurposeTo investigate the effects of a rectal preparation regimen, that consisted of a rectal cleansing enema and an endorectal gel filling protocol, on prostate imaging quality (PI-QUAL). MethodsMultiparametric MRI (mpMRI) was performed in 150 consecutive patients divided into two groups of 75 patients. One group received a rectal preparation with a cleansing enema and endorectal gel filling (median age 65.3 years, median PSA level 6 ng/ml). The other patient group did not receive such a preparation (median age 64 years, median PSA level 6 ng/ml). Two uroradiologists independently rated general image quality and lesion visibility on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), T2-weighted (T2w), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) images using a five-point ordinal scale. In addition, two uroradiologists assigned PI-QUAL scores, using the dedicated scoring sheet. Data sets were compared using visual grading characteristics (VGC) and receiver operating characteristics (ROC)/ area under the curve (AUC) analysis. ResultsVGC revealed significantly better general image quality for DWI (AUC R1 0.708 (0.628–0.779 CI, p < 0.001; AUC R2 0.687 (0.606–0.760 CI, p < 0.001) and lesion visibility for both readers (AUC R1 0.729 (0.607–0.831 CI, p < 0.001); AUC R2 0.714 (0.590–0.818CI, p < 0.001) in the preparation group. For T2w imaging, rectal preparation resulted in significantly better lesion visibility for both readers (R1 0.663 (0.537–0.774 CI, p = 0.014; R2 0.663 (0.537–0.774 CI, p = 0.014)). Averaged PI-QUAL scores were significantly improved with rectal preparation (AUC R3/R4 0.667, CI 0.581–0.754, p < 0.001). ConclusionRectal preparation significantly improved prostate imaging quality (PI-QUAL) and lesion visibility. Hence, a rectal preparation regimen consisting of a rectal cleansing enema and an endorectal gel filling could be considered.