Abstract

BackgroundVariations in clinical practice contribute to negative outcomes for children with cancer. Research in this area is imperative to standardise practice, yet such research is challenging to undertake, and a significant proportion of studies fail. A common reason for failure is poor recruitment, yet little information is available to support researchers and clinicians planning such research.MethodsOur primary aim was to describe the recruitment strategies and outcomes in a tertiary children’s hospital across multiple observational supportive care studies. Secondary aims were to establish principles to improve both recruitment strategies and the reporting of recruitment. We undertook a retrospective descriptive analysis of the recruitment logs and data from three studies in pediatric oncology. The mean time to recruit one participant was calculated. Common reasons for not approaching eligible participants and reasons potential participants declined are described.ResultsOf the 235 potential candidates across all studies, 186 (79%) were approached and of these 125 (67%) provided consent, with 117 (63%) completing baseline measures. We estimated recruitment per participant required an average 98 min of experienced research nurse time. Four factors are described that influence recruitment and six principles are outlined to maximise recruitment and the generalisability of research findings.ConclusionsWe highlight the recruitment experiences across three different projects in children’s cancer supportive care research and provide a roadmap for other researchers planning to undertake clinical research in pediatrics.

Highlights

  • Variations in clinical practice contribute to negative outcomes for children with cancer

  • The highly organised structure of co-operative clinical trials in pediatric oncology are commonly supported by central administration and dedicated research staff at each institution

  • There are numerous barriers recruiting to supportive care research including: difficulties obtaining ethical approvals, logistical challenges with identification and contact with eligible participants, clinician gatekeeping, perception of potential burden and less available funding and resources compared to cancer treatment clinical trials [2, 3]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Variations in clinical practice contribute to negative outcomes for children with cancer. Research in this area is imperative to standardise practice, yet such research is challenging to undertake, and a significant proportion of studies fail. Problem description The first critical step for any clinical research is recruitment of participants. Significant efforts are made to enrol as many children as possible to receive anticancer treatment through a clinical trial [2]. There are numerous barriers recruiting to supportive care research including: difficulties obtaining ethical approvals, logistical challenges with identification and contact with eligible participants, clinician gatekeeping, perception of potential burden and less available funding and resources compared to cancer treatment clinical trials [2, 3]. Many supportive care studies fail to meet their anticipated recruitment rate

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call