Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that affects thinking, and behavior and is the most common cause of dementia. In Alzheimer’s disease (AD) clinical trials, there is a severe lack of underrepresented and marginalized populations. Despite overwhelming evidence that these groups are more likely to develop AD, various recruitment barriers impair them from being accepted into current AD clinical studies, which threatens these findings' overall generalizability and scientific impact. As a result, there is less understanding of overall needs, no mechanism for identifying and comparing disease variations, and a limited range of available interventions. In this study, we aim to analyze the recruitment, reporting, and retention strategies of Hispanic/Latinx and Black individuals in AD Clinical Trials for the last 35 years to create a novel model system to increase the diversity and inclusion of minoritized groups in Alzheimer’s Clinical Trials.MethodWe extracted the data from the clinicaltrials.gov database and applied the inclusion criteria: Year: 1999‐Present, Population: Older Adults (65>), Alzheimer’s Diagnosed, and Healthy. Intervention: Pharmaceutical/drug. Funding: NIH, Industry. Status: Completed. For our outcome variables, we included the following: Reported and non‐reported recruitment demographic, the inclusion of white, Hispanic/Latin, Black/African American, Asian, and Unknown. For our analyses, we performed a Linear regression on cohort demographic makeup in five‐year intervals, reported vs. non‐reported demographic, and the percentage of ethnicity recruited.ResultOur search yielded n = 117 clinical trials. 28% of NIH‐sponsored drug‐based clinical trials have reported cohort demographic makeup. 61% of Industry‐sponsored drug‐based reported cohort demographic make‐up.ConclusionWe found that despite the increasing research focusing on the importance of the inclusion of underrepresented individuals in clinical trials. The number of underrepresented minorities in AD clinical trials continues to be significantly and alarmingly low, hindering the scientific process of developing therapeutic methods for Alzheimer’s Disease. Moreover, several laws and policies have been released to enforce the reporting of ethnicity/race of clinical trials cohort have not been adequately enforced and followed, raising concerns for policy efficacy.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call