Abstract

BackgroundDespite important implications for the budgets, statistical power and generalisability of research findings, detailed reports of recruitment and retention in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are rare. The NOURISH RCT evaluated a community-based intervention for first-time mothers that promoted protective infant feeding practices as a primary prevention strategy for childhood obesity. The aim of this paper is to provide a detailed description and evaluation of the recruitment and retention strategies used.MethodsA two stage recruitment process designed to provide a consecutive sampling framework was used. First- time mothers delivering healthy term infants were initially approached in postnatal wards of the major maternity services in two Australian cities for consent to later contact (Stage 1). When infants were approximately four months old mothers were re-contacted by mail for enrolment (Stage 2), baseline measurements (Time 1) and subsequent random allocation to the intervention or control condition. Outcomes were assessed at infant ages 14 months (Time 2) and 24 months (Time 3).ResultsAt Stage 1, 86% of eligible mothers were approached and of these women, 76% consented to later contact. At Stage 2, 3% had become ineligible and 76% could be recontacted. Of the latter, 44% consented to full enrolment and were allocated. This represented 21% of mothers screened as eligible at Stage 1. Retention at Time 3 was 78%. Mothers who did not consent or discontinued the study were younger and less likely to have a university education.ConclusionsThe consent and retention rates of our sample of first time mothers are comparable with or better than other similar studies. The recruitment strategy used allowed for detailed information from non-consenters to be collected; thus selection bias could be estimated. Recommendations for future studies include being able to contact participants via mobile phone (particularly text messaging), offering home visits to reduce participant burden and considering the use of financial incentives to support participant retention.Trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Number ACTRN12608000056392

Highlights

  • Reporting of the recruitment and retention of participants in randomised trials has improved with the advent of the CONSORT Statement [1,2,3], detailed protocols and the lessons learnt are rarely described [4]

  • Completion rates for children enrolled in obesity treatments are low [29], reinforcing the importance of effective primary prevention strategies in order to reduce the demand for treatment

  • Data from NOURISH will be combined with other similar concurrent studies in a prospective meta-analysis [30], which will further strengthen the value of this study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Reporting of the recruitment and retention of participants in randomised trials has improved with the advent of the CONSORT Statement [1,2,3], detailed protocols and the lessons learnt are rarely described [4]. When consent rates are low and/or loss to follow up and withdrawals result in high attrition, the potential for selection bias and retention bias is increased, respectively. Both biases limit the generalisability of results, and reduce the successful translation of any positive outcome effects into practice [6]. Despite important implications for the budgets, statistical power and generalisability of research findings, detailed reports of recruitment and retention in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are rare. The aim of this paper is to provide a detailed description and evaluation of the recruitment and retention strategies used

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.