Recovery time in target controlled infusion versus manual infusion of propofol in total intravenous anaesthesia for endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography procedure using laryngeal mask airway-gastro: A randomised comparative study.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare manual infusion versus target-controlled infusion (TCI) in total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) utilising laryngeal mask airway (LMA)-gastro during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) procedures. This was a single-blind randomised trial. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups. TCI group included 27 patients, where TCI of propofol was implemented with the Schnider pharmacokinetic model driven by a computer-controlled syringe pump. The TIVA group included 27 patients with a loading dose of 2 mg/kg of propofol, followed by manual infusion of 15 mg/kg/h for the first 15 min, 13 mg/kg/h for the next 15 min, then 11 mg/kg/h for 30 min and 10 mg/kg/h for 60 min and finally maintained at 9 mg/kg/h. The primary objective was to compare recovery time following cessation of propofol infusion in both groups. The difference in the total dose of propofol, time to achieve anaesthesia induction, first attempt success rate, ease of LMA-gastro insertion, ease of insertion, success rate of endoscope device and post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge time were the secondary objectives. T-test and Chi-square test were used for statistical analysis. The time required for the recovery was significantly less in the TCI group than in the TIVA group (mean ± standard deviation; 11.60 ± 2.27 versus 15.4 ± 3.25 minutes, P < 0.001). The duration of ERCP, ease of LMA and endoscope insertion were comparable between the groups. There was no post-operative recall of intra-operative events in the groups. TCI offers earlier recovery than TIVA in patients undergoing ERCP procedures using LMA-gastro.