Abstract

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to investigate the treatment outcome in men with detrusor underactivity (DU) and voiding dysfunction who underwent transurethral resection or incision of the prostate (TURP or TUIP). DU usually affects decision making whether bladder outlet surgery is necessary. Materials and MethodsA total of 60 men with urodynamic DU and voiding dysfunction who underwent TURP or TUIP from 1998 to 2015 were retrospectively analyzed for their treatment outcome after follow-up for more than 1 year. DU was defined as urodynamic evidence of low detrusor pressure (<40 cm H2O), low flow rate (<10 mL/s), a postvoid residual urine volume >300 mL, and a voiding efficiency (VE) of <33%. Satisfactory outcome was defined as improved quality of life and having a VE of >50% after treatment. Predictive factor for a successful outcome was also analyzed. ResultsAt a mean follow-up of 31 months, 49 (81.7%) patients had achieved a satisfactory treatment outcome. Among the patients who received TURP and TUIP, 38/44 (86.4%) and 11/16 (68.8%) had satisfactory outcome, respectively. The satisfactory group had significantly higher detrusor pressure and greater bladder compliance at baseline than the unsatisfactory group. There was significant improvement in the urodynamic parameters after treatment in the satisfactory group. Among the patients with satisfactory outcome, 34 (69.4%) patients had recovery of detrusor function within 3 months. ConclusionActive surgical treatment such as TURP or TUIP results in recovery of VE and detrusor function within 3 months after treatment in the majority of patients with DU.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call